Executive Summary Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj (1657–1689), the second ruler of the Maratha Empire, inherited a kingdom under existential threat from the Mughals, Siddis, Portuguese, and regional rivals. His reign was defined by adaptive military strategies that combined his father Shivaji’s guerrilla tactics with bold offensive campaigns, economic pressure, and diplomatic maneuvering. Sambhaji’s approach delayed Mughal expansion into the Deccan for nearly a decade, preserved Maratha sovereignty, and expanded influence in southern India. However, his reliance on rapid raids, internal betrayals, and resource limitations ultimately led to his capture and execution. This report analyzes his key strategies, their tactical execution, and their long-term impact on the Maratha-Mughal conflict.

Military Strategies and Tactical Execution

1. Guerrilla Warfare and Asymmetric Combat Sambhaji refined Shivaji’s Ganimi Kava (guerrilla tactics) to counter the Mughals’ numerical superiority. His forces avoided large-scale battles, instead launching lightning raids on supply lines, outposts, and revenue centers.

Burhanpur Raid (1680): Sambhaji’s most audacious strike targeted Burhanpur, a wealthy Mughal trade hub. Disguising his movements, he bypassed fortified positions, looted the city’s treasury, and executed officials enforcing jizya (Islamic tax on non-Muslims). The raid crippled Aurangzeb’s revenue stream and diverted Mughal forces from the Deccan.

Scorched-Earth Tactics: To deny resources to advancing Mughal armies, Sambhaji ordered the burning of villages and crops in Konkan and Maharashtra. This forced Aurangzeb’s troops into protracted sieges, exacerbating supply shortages.

Effectiveness: These tactics stretched Mughal logistics, buying time for Maratha regrouping. However, they alienated local populations, weakening grassroots support.

2. Fortification Networks and Defensive Warfare Sambhaji prioritized fortifying key strongholds like Raigad, Panhala, and Purandar, which served as supply depots and fallback points.

Multi-Layered Defense: Forts were reinforced with hidden escape routes, water reservoirs, and overlapping artillery positions. For example, during the 1682 siege of Ramsej, Maratha defenders repelled Mughal mining attempts and artillery bombardments for five months.

Strategic Withdrawals: When outnumbered, Sambhaji abandoned indefensible positions—such as retreating from Goa in 1684 to avoid encirclement by Mughal-Portuguese forces—preserving manpower.

Effectiveness: Forts delayed Mughal advances but required constant reinforcement. By 1687, Aurangzeb captured Satara and Wai, exposing the limitations of static defenses.

3. Naval Blockades and Coastal Campaigns Sambhaji inherited Shivaji’s navy but expanded its role in disrupting enemy trade.

Goa Invasion (1683): Maratha ships blockaded Portuguese ports, capturing Salsette and Bardez. Sambhaji’s forces nearly overran Goa before Mughal reinforcements arrived, forcing a retreat.

Alliance with Arab Pirates: To counter the Siddis of Janjira, Sambhaji partnered with Arab naval powers, enhancing his fleet’s reach. Despite repeated attempts, Janjira’s island fortress remained unconquered.

Effectiveness: Naval campaigns secured coastal revenues but failed to dislodge entrenched rivals like the Siddis. The 1684 treaty with the English for artillery supplies highlights resource gaps.

4. Economic Warfare: Chauth and Sardeshmukhi Sambhaji enforced Shivaji’s taxation system (Chauth: 25% revenue; Sardeshmukhi: 10% levy) in conquered territories, crippling Mughal-affiliated economies.

Targeted Looting: Raids on Surat (1680) and Bharuch (1685) focused on Mughal treasuries and trade caravans, funding Maratha campaigns.

Resource Denial: By sacking Bijapuri and Portuguese outposts, Sambhaji starved Aurangzeb’s allies of funds, forcing them into unfavorable alliances.

Effectiveness: Economic pressure strained Mughal campaigns but provoked retaliatory raids, exacerbating Maratha resource shortages.

5. Diplomatic Maneuvering and Alliances Sambhaji leveraged regional rivalries to isolate Aurangzeb.

Harboring Mughal Rebels: He sheltered Prince Akbar, Aurangzeb’s son, for five years (1681–1686), using him to legitimize Maratha resistance. However, Akbar’s eventual flight to Persia undermined this strategy.

Southern Coalitions: Treaties with the Qutb Shahis of Golkonda and Chikkadevaraja of Mysore initially checked Mughal expansion. Mysore’s later defection to Aurangzeb, however, exposed diplomatic fragility.

Effectiveness: Alliances provided temporary respite but collapsed under Mughal pressure. The 1684 pact with the English East India Company secured firearms but failed to ensure lasting support.

Assessment of Effectiveness Short-Term Successes Delaying Aurangzeb’s Advance: Sambhaji’s guerrilla campaigns forced Aurangzeb to remain in the Deccan for 27 years, preventing Mughal consolidation in the north. Economic Resilience: The Chauth system funded Maratha operations despite losing territorial control. By 1687, Sambhaji still held critical forts like Raigad and Sinhagad. Psychological Impact: High-profile raids (e.g., Burhanpur) demoralized Mughal commanders and boosted Maratha morale.

Long-Term Limitations Overextension: Simultaneous wars against the Mughals, Portuguese, Siddis, and Mysore stretched Maratha resources thin. The failed 1686 Mysore invasion marked a strategic overreach. Internal Betrayals: Sambhaji’s harsh punishments for dissent (e.g., executing 24 conspirators in 1683) bred resentment. His 1689 capture resulted from intelligence leaks by disgruntled nobles. Lack of Technological Edge: Despite English artillery imports, Maratha forces lagged in siegecraft, failing to breach Janjira or Portuguese forts.

Legacy and Historical Impact

1. Foundation for Maratha Resurrection Sambhaji’s resistance bought critical time for Rajaram and Tarabai to regroup after his death. By 1707, the Marathas under Shahu I reversed Mughal gains, validating Sambhaji’s attritional approach.

2. Influence on Mughal Decline Aurangzeb’s Deccan campaigns drained the Mughal treasury, with Sambhaji’s raids contributing to a 50% revenue drop in Surat by 1689. This financial collapse accelerated the empire’s fragmentation post-1707.

3. Strategic Innovations Mobile Governance: Sambhaji’s court often operated from forts like Panhala, prefiguring mobile command centers in modern warfare. Hybrid Warfare: Blending guerrilla tactics, economic pressure, and psychological operations presaged 20th-century insurgency models.

https://archive.org/details/Hortus_Indicus_Malabaricus_Volume1

https://archive.org/details/Hortus_Indicus_Malabaricus_Volume2

https://archive.org/details/Hortus_Indicus_Malabaricus_Volume3

https://archive.org/details/Hortus_Indicus_Malabaricus_Volume4

https://archive.org/details/Hortus_Indicus_Malabaricus_Volume5

https://archive.org/details/Hortus_Indicus_Malabaricus_Volume6

https://archive.org/details/Hortus_Indicus_Malabaricus_Volume7

https://archive.org/details/Hortus_Indicus_Malabaricus_Volume8

https://archive.org/details/Hortus_Indicus_Malabaricus_Volume9

https://archive.org/details/Hortus_Indicus_Malabaricus_Volume10

https://archive.org/details/Hortus_Indicus_Malabaricus_Volume11

https://archive.org/details/Hortus_Indicus_Malabaricus_Volume12

The Kasjo of Konkani, the Cajou of the Luftines and the Belgians, is a tree of medium size, with a stout, white trunk, gray bark, purple interior, a sour smell, and astringent qualities. It is covered with dark-green branches that elegantly spread out.

The root is whitish, with a brown bark covered in thin filaments.

The leaves adhere to the branches in an orderly fashion. They are oblong-round, smooth (glabrous), of a common green color, with some veins protruding downward from the dense central part and running out to the sides. The tender leaves of this tree, when rubbed in the hands, are sticky and emit a fragrant odor. However, older leaves that fall off before they are fully matured turn red.The flowers are fragrant and exude a honeyed odor. They grow at the tips of branches in racemes. From the small green calyx, they are arranged in five pointed lobes with five smooth, reflexed petals that transition in color from greenish-yellow to red and finally to purple. The stamens are slender and yellow-green at the tips. These occupy the middle of the flower cavity, from which emerges the pistil (the female reproductive part), which later develops into the fruit.The fruits resemble pears in shape and size. They are smooth (glabrous), shiny, and change color as they ripen—first red, then green, and finally yellow. The flesh inside is greenish-yellow, spongy (fungous), filled with water, and surrounded by a thin skin. The fruit emits a yellowish smell and has a vinous (wine-like) taste but is sharp and astringent if not fully ripe. However, attached to one end of this fruit is an additional structure resembling a hare's kidney in shape and size. This structure has a hollow on one side covered with gray bark. Beneath this bark lies another pale core shaped like the entire fruit itself. This core is fragrant and has a sweet almond-like flavor with a softer taste. Between these two layers of bark lies a honeydew-like substance that is sharp and waxy in texture. Its flavor begins as mildly sweet but quickly becomes highly astringent, tingling the tongue and throat while maintaining its sharpness.This tree grows abundantly in Malabar (a region in India). In favorable years—specifically during August and September—it produces ripe fruit and remains productive for about thirty years.From the fruits of this tree, a drink can be extracted that becomes vinous (alcoholic) and intoxicating when properly fermented. The fruits are also eaten as delicacies; their flavor is as pleasing as almonds or pistachios when prepared correctly. However, they cannot be eaten raw because they immediately irritate the skin painfully if handled improperly or consumed unprocessed. Instead, they are opened using a knife or treated like pistachios by sprinkling them with ashes to make them edible. When consumed raw or improperly processed, they sting the throat due to their sharp and bitter taste. To mitigate this sharpness, they are cut into pieces and mixed with water or wine along with powdered seasoning. This preparation reduces their astringency and makes them more palatable.The inhabitants also eat the kernels after lightly toasting them as an aphrodisiac (to stimulate Venus). From the honey-like substance found in the bark of this tree, they extract an abundant amount of pungent oil used by painters to dye fabrics black with an indelible color. When wood is treated with this oil, it becomes resistant to rot and more durable. Additionally, this acrid oil is highly effective against skin conditions such as lichen planus or impetigo. Locals use it to treat scabies or kill worms by mixing it with excrement for application.Finally, consuming these kernels strengthens the stomach, aids digestion by promoting fermentation of food, and alleviates vomiting or nausea. The juice of these fruits is also used medicinally to treat diarrhea and diabetes.

Footnote for Picture:

This tree has been described by various authors but often imperfectly. However, Piso provides an accurate description in his book Natural History & Medicine of Brazil (Nat. & Med. Brasil.), Book 4, Chapter 6; likewise does Mantissa Aromatica (Mantiff. Aromat.), Chapter 16. Both works describe both the tree and its fruit in detail while noting that it is found in many places in Brazil where it is native under the name "Acajaiba."The fruit is commonly called "Acaju." Another species of cashew is described by Caspar Bauhin (Cafpar Bauhini). Rochefort refers to it as "Acajou" and identifies three varieties—one bearing fruit commonly known as Cajou. 

The term "ukku" in Kannada carries dual meanings tied to both metallurgical processes and the resulting steel product. Here's the breakdown:

Linguistic and Metallurgical Connection

1. Kannada Roots
   • The Kannada root ukku- means "to swell; to boil over," reflecting the physical process of liquid metal frothing or rising during smelting
   • In Kannada, ukku refers to both steel and actions like "boiling excessively" or "rising (as the sea)".
2. Sanskrit adoption
   • Sanskrit word "utsa," has similar meaning refers to ebullience as well as steel. 
3. Steel Production Process
   • Crucible steelmaking involved melting iron with carbon-rich materials (e.g., leaves, bamboo) in sealed clay crucibles.
   • At high temperatures (~1,500°C), impurities (slag) separated and floated to the surface, a process linguistically linked to "boiling over"
   • The term ukku likely originated from this slag-separation phase, where the molten metal "boiled over" as slag was skimmed off.

Cultural and Historical Context

• Regional Variations:
  • Tamil/Malayalam: urukku ("melted thing").
  • Telugu: hukku.
  • Kannada: ukku (steel) and ukku (to boil over).
  • "Wuz" (also spelled wus or wook) in Gujarati historically referred to high-carbon crucible steel, later anglicized as wootz 
• Global Impact:
  • This steel, later called wootz (anglicized from ukku), was prized for its quality and used in Damascus swords.

Summary

The Kannada term ukku encapsulates both the action (boiling over during slag removal) and the product (high-carbon steel). This duality highlights how ancient metallurgical practices influenced language, with the steel’s name deriving directly from its production method. Given this wide usage of the term ukku of Kannada and its derivatives in Tamil, Malayalam, Telugu, Gujarati

It is high time to give credit to what is common between Kannada, Tamil, Malayalam, Sanskrit, Gujarati.  

Sanathana!